Our Knowledge of the Law PDF ePub eBook

Books Info:

Our Knowledge of the Law free pdf In the long-standing debate between positivism and non-positivism, legal validity has always been a subject of controversy. While positivists deny that moral values play any role in the determination of legal validity, non-positivists affirm the opposite thesis. In departing from this narrow point of view, the book focuses on the notion of legal knowledge. Apart from what one takes to constitute the grounds of legal validity, there is a more fundamental issue about cognitive validity: how do we acquire knowledge of whatever is assumed to constitute the elements of legal validity? When the question is posed in this form a fundamental shift takes place. Given that knowledge is a philosophical concept, for anything to constitute an adequate ground for legal validity it must satisfy the standards set by knowledge. In exploring those standards the author argues that knowledge is the outcome of an activity of judging, which is constrained by reasons (reflexive). While these reasons may vary with the domain of judging, the reflexive structure of the practice of judging imposes certain constraints on what can constitute a reason for judging. Amongst these constraints are found not only general metaphysical limitations but also the fundamental principle that one with the capacity to judge is autonomous or, in other words, capable of determining the reasons that form the basis of action. One sees, as soon as autonomy has been introduced into the parameters of knowledge, that law is necessarily connected with every other practical domain. The author shows, in the end, that the issue of knowledge is orthogonal to questions about the inclusion or exclusion of morality, for what really matters is whether the putative grounds of legal validity are appropriate to the generation of knowledge. The outcome is far more integral than much work in current theory: neither an absolute deference to either universal moral standards or practice-independent values nor a complete adherence to conventionality and institutional arrangements will do. In suggesting that the current positivism versus non-positivism debate, when it comes to determining law's nature, misses the crux of the matter, the book aims to provoke a fertile new debate in legal theory. "George Pavlakos' engaging book tackles the fundamental question of what makes legal knowledge possible. Since all articulate thought has to conform to implicit rules of grammar, it is necessarily normatively structured. Thus normativity cannot be something external to human thinking that we study from the outside, but is intrinsic to all human practices (including the natural sciences). This insight opens up fascinating new lines of inquiry into the character of law and its relations to other normative domains." Professor Sir Neil MacCormick, Edinburgh University "With admirable analytical acumen, George Pavlakos underscores the practical character of legal knowledge as well as the importance of argumentation in legal theory. He rejects those approaches to the nature of law that rest on conventional criteria as well as those that turn on factors altogether independent of practice, developing instead the thesis that objectivity and knowledge emerge from practical activity reflecting the spontaneity of human reason. In light of this notion of legal cognition as a practical activity directed and constrained by reason, the law is seen as an enduring institution, jurisprudence as a humanistic discipline. A truly important work." Professor Dr. Robert Alexy, Christian-Albrechts-Universitat zu Kiel

About George Pavlakos

George Pavlakos is Research Chair in Globalisation and Legal Theory at Antwerp University. He was previously the City Solicitor's Trust Lecturer in Jurisprudence at Queen's University Belfast. He has published widely in the areas of legal theory and philosophy- his other books include a monograph in German entitled Rechtsontologie und praktische Vernunft (Nomos Verlag, 2007) and an edited book entitled Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy (Hart Publishing, 2007).

Details Book

Author : George Pavlakos
Publisher : Hart Publishing
Data Published : 01 June 2007
ISBN : 1841135038
EAN : 9781841135038
Format Book : PDF, Epub, DOCx, TXT
Number of Pages : 278 pages
Age + : 15 years
Language : English
Rating :

Reviews Our Knowledge of the Law

17 Comments Add a comment

Related eBooks Download

  • Law, Morality and the Private Domain free pdfLaw, Morality and the Private Domain

    Are judges morally accountable. Is legal validity value-free. Do animals have rights. These are some of the questions considered in this collection of essays. Moral problems. argues Raymond Wacks. pervade the legal system..

  • Legal Aspects of Pain Management free pdfLegal Aspects of Pain Management

    The book sets out the basic facts of the legal system. It is written without any expectation of prior legal knowledge. in a style which is jargon-free and designed to clarify the law for the non-lawyer..

  • Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation free pdfFundamentals of Legal Argumentation

    Legal argumentation is a distinctively multidisciplinary field of inquiry. It draws its data. assumptions and methods from disciplines such as legal theory. legal philosophy. logic. argumentation theory..

  • The Autonomy of Law free pdfThe Autonomy of Law

    This collection of original essays from distinguished legal philosophers offers a challenging assessment of the nature and viability of legal positivism..

  • Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences free pdfValidity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences

    This book combines an overview of validity theory. trends in validation practices and a review of standards and guidelines in several international jurisdictions with research synthesis of the validity evidence in different research areas..

  • Our Knowledge of the Law free pdfOur Knowledge of the Law

    . In the long-standing debate between positivism and non-positivism, legal validity has always been a subject of controversy. While positivists deny that moral values play any role in the determinatio