Deontology, Responsibility and Equality PDF ePub eBook

Books Info:

Deontology, Responsibility and Equality free pdf Three questions that loom large in moral and political philosophy are these: Can deontological moral constraints be justified? When, if ever, are we morally responsible for what we do? How is the ideal of equality best configured? 'Deontology, Responsibility and Equality' deals with selected aspects of these three broad questions. It discusses critically certain attempts by Frances Kamm and Thomas Nagel (among others) to account for the impermissibility of minimising violations in terms of moral status. Also, it challenges the view that there is a morally relevant difference between doing and allowing harm and, especially, between killing and letting die. In relation to the second question, it concentrates on recent developments within compatibilist accounts of moral responsibility prompted by the work of Harry Frankfurt. It challenges his purported refutation of the principle of alternative possibilities as well as certain positive compatibilist, identification-based accounts of responsibility. Finally, with respect to the last question, the book focuses on how we should understand the ideal of equality of opportunity and the moral significance of the distinction between social and natural inequalities. It defends equality of outcome over equality of opportunity and the view that natural inequalities are, if bad, no less bad than social inequalities. This book has been accepted at the University of Copenhagen for a public defence as a Dr Phil dissertation.

About Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen

Kasper Lippert- Rasmussen (born 1964), DPhil (Oxford), MA (Essex), Cand. Scient. Pol.

Details Book

Author : Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen
Publisher : Museum Tusculanum Press
Data Published : 01 February 2005
ISBN : 8763502259
EAN : 9788763502252
Format Book : PDF, Epub, DOCx, TXT
Number of Pages : 503 pages
Age + : 15 years
Language : English
Rating :

Reviews Deontology, Responsibility and Equality



17 Comments Add a comment




Related eBooks Download


  • Responsibility in Law and Morality free pdfResponsibility in Law and Morality

    Lawyers who write about responsibility tend to focus on criminal law at the expense of civil and public law- while philosophers tend to treat responsibility as a moral concept.and either ignore the law or consider legal responsibility to be a more or less distorted reflection of its moral counterpart..


  • Gender Equality, Citizenship and Human Rights free pdfGender Equality, Citizenship and Human Rights

    This comparative volume examines the ways in which current controversies and political. legal. and social struggles for gender equality raise conceptual questions and challenge our thinking on political theories of equality..


  • The Right to Equality in European Human Rights Law free pdfThe Right to Equality in European Human Rights Law

    A right to equality and non-discrimination is widely seen as fundamental in democratic legal systems. But failure to identify the human interest that equality aims to uphold reinforces the argument of those who attack it as morally empty or unsubstantiated and weakens its status as a fundamental human right..


  • Equality of Opportunity free pdfEquality of Opportunity

    John Roemer points out that there are two views of equality of opportunity that are widely held in the late-20th century. The first. which he calls the nondiscrimination principle..


  • Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility free pdfExploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility

    Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility investigates the philosophical and scientific arguments for free will skepticism and their implications. Skepticism about free will and moral responsibility has been on the rise in recent years..


  • Deontology, Responsibility and Equality free pdfDeontology, Responsibility and Equality

    . Three questions that loom large in moral and political philosophy are these: Can deontological moral constraints be justified? When, if ever, are we morally responsible for what we do? How is the id